Coatings deposited as liquids commonly solidify by cooling, drying (solvent removal), curing (chemical reaction), or a combination of these processes.
By Eng. Orietta León
Immediately after depositing a coating solution becomes a liquid. To compensate for the shrinkage that accompanies solvent loss, the remaining material is moved into the substrate as the solvent evaporates. Once enough solvent evaporates, the remaining material solidifies, it is by definition capable of withstanding elastic stresses.
As an additional solvent comes out of the solid by further drying, the coating cannot contract freely because, to be a coating, it must adhere to the substrate. This contraction of the volume causes tension, which is locally the difference between the state of adhesion and the state of equilibrium, which is stress-free (apart from the isotropic ambient pressure).
This tension is accompanied by stress, which is related to the modulus of the rowing material. In most of a coating, the stress is only the tensile stress in the plane (at edges and inclusions more complex concentrations of stress arise). In coated end products, stresses are the main causes of defects such as curl, delamination, and cracking.
The developed stress mechanisms are still under active study. Croll developed a simple one-dimensional theory that estimates that, in the stress plane in a thermoplastic coating by evaporation of the solvent coated on rigid substrates, drying was so slow that the concentration did not vary with the depth within the coating.
Croll took the stress to be only in the plane, uniform and proportional to the decrease in the volumetric fraction of the solvent after it passed the level to which the coating solidifies, and therefore acquires an elastic modulus. Croll's predictions of the final stress level match quite well with some measurements of the final tension he made with the cantilevered deviation method.
Other research also used the cantilevered deviation method to measure the evolution of stress in different coatings. Despite this progress, experimental measurements and relevant determinations of physical properties are still scarce. A series of studies use a finite element method to solve linear elasticity equations to predict contraction and development stress in drying clays.
They considered only cases of small deformation, for which mass transport was not coupled with mechanical equilibrium.
Recently, other researchers were the first to model coatings by drying to account for large deformations. They employed a finite element method to solve the coupled equations of mass transfer from coating to airflow, diffusion with convection in solvent-polymer layers, and a linear ratio of stress to a quadratic measure of stress.
Their constitutive ratio was appropriate for compressible elastic solids, many of them polymers. They also examined the effects not only of gradient concentration (negligible for Croll) but also of outer edges, thickness variations and coating inclusions. I
They also incorporated the creep threshold and post-flux viscous deformation, and explored the effect of the plastic creep threshold.
More recently, in other works they also considered the large deformation in the gel by drying, in which the non-Fickian diffusion is coupled with the stress contributions of a hypoelastic polymer network also as an ideal liquid solvent, although their analysis was limited to the elastic coating model.
Diffusion of solvents in coating and mass transfer in gas
Pairs by drying not only mechanical and mass transport, but also heat transfer. For solvent to evaporate from the free surface of a coating, its latent heat of vaporization must supply there. Conduction through the substrate, convection by flowing gas, and radiation from the surroundings can all contribute.
These may not be fast enough to prevent evaporative cooling of a solvent coating when it is first deposited. However, when the surface of the coating has solidified, evaporation has slowed down and the heat transfer within the layer is much faster than the mass transfer than the temperature of the coating is uniform. Therefore, heat transfer is not considered.
As long as the externally imposed airflow, temperature and partial pressure of the solvent are uniform, a deposited coating can dry out and solidify evenly in the plane.
D.Y. Perera, D.V. Eynde, 1981. Considerations on a Cantilever (Beam) Method for Measuring the Internal Stress in Organic Coatings. Journal of Coatings Technology, 53(677), 39-44.
D.Y. Perera, D.V. Eynde, 1983. Solvent influence on the development of internal stress in a thermoplastic coating. Journal of Coatings Technology, 55(699), 37-43.
E.D. Cohen, E.B. Gutoff, 1992. Modern Coating and Drying Technology. VCH Publishers. New York.
K. Sato, 1980. The internal stress of coating films. Progress in Organic Coatings, 8(2), 143-160.
K.N. Christodoulou, E.J. Lightfoot, R.W. Powell, 1998. Model of stress‐induced defect formation in drying polymer films. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 44, 1484-1498.
M. Hasatani, Y. Itaya, K. Hayakawa, 1992. Viscoelastic strain-stress and heat/moisture transfer -, Drying Technology, 10(4), 1013-1036.
M. Hasatani, Y. ltaya, K. Muroie, S. Taniguchi, 1993. Contraction characlfrlstlcs of molded ceramics during drying, Drying Technology, 11(4), 815-830.
R.B. Bird, W.E. Steward, E. N. Lightfoot, 1960. Transport Phenomena, Wiley, New York.
S.G. Croll, 1979. The origin of residual internal stress in solvent‐cast thermoplastic coatings. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 23, 847-858.
Y. Itaya, S. Mabuchi, M. Hasatani, 1995. Deformation Behavior of Ceramic Slabs by Nonuniform Drying. Drying Technology, 13(3), 801-819.